All courses
Yonsei 2026-Fall | Bokyung Lee Upcoming

CDM2008: Design Research

Design research turns questions about people, contexts, and experiences into evidence that can guide responsible design decisions. This course introduces a systematic process for framing research, selecting qualitative methods, conducting fieldwork, synthesizing findings, and communicating actionable insights.

Class time
Friday(s), 13:00–16:00
Location
VeritasB 206 (DFK Idea shop)
Instructor
Prof. Bokyung Lee
Language
English
Homework supports learning and reflection.

Homework is not graded as a separate work item, but it helps students practice, reflect, and develop their thinking throughout the course. Completion, preparation, and engagement contribute to the Participation / Attitude / Diligence assessment.

At a glance

Homework overview

Select a work item below to view its full details.

Homework Weight Focus Due D-Day
Project 1
Homework #1 — Research Interest Card 2026.09.11 Homework #2 — Introduction & Initial RQ Working Draft 2026.09.18 Homework #3 — Comparison Conditions + Initial Stimuli 2026.10.02 Homework #4 — Revised Comparison Conditions + Stimuli 2026.10.09 Homework #5 — Section 3.3 Research Stimuli 2026.10.16 Homework #6 — Post-presentation Sections 1–3.3 Revision 2026.10.30 Homework #7 — Section 4 Method Draft I 2026.11.06 Homework #8 — Finalize the Study Materials Pack & Conduct a Pilot 2026.11.13 Homework #9 — Final Method Section 2026.11.20 Homework #10 — Sections 5.1 & 5.2 Quantitative Results Working Draft 2026.11.27 Homework #11 — Complete Section 5 Results Draft 2026.12.03
Homework #1

Homework #1: Research Interest Card

Project
Project 1
Format
Individual one-slide preparation
Due
2026.09.11
Prepare one concise card that introduces a design-related context, experience, or behavior that you may want to explore during the semester. This is an exploratory starting point, not a finalized research proposal.

Contents should include

  • The context, experience, or behavior of interest
  • Who is involved or affected
  • What feels unresolved, uncertain, or worth investigating
  • One possible design idea or relevant example
  • Three keywords

Presentation

Bring the card to Week 2 and be prepared to introduce it briefly during interest sharing and team formation.

Upload file

File type
One slide or one-page PDF
Recommended length
One slide
File naming rule
H1_StudentID_StudentName.pdf
Example
H1_2026123456_JaneKim.pdf

Submission method

No advance upload is required. Bring the completed card to Week 2.

Learning Focus

  • Research-interest articulation: Expressing a broad interest clearly enough to discuss with potential teammates.
  • Question orientation: Identifying what remains uncertain rather than proposing a finished solution.
Homework #2

Homework #2: Introduction & Initial RQ Working Draft

Project
Project 1
Format
Team working-manuscript update
Due
2026.09.18
Use the submitted Research Direction Snapshot + Hypothesis Scaffold to begin Sections 1 and 3.1 of the shared master manuscript. This is a working draft rather than a polished final section.

Contents should include

  • Section 1 · Introduction: Research context, users, design-relevant phenomenon, unresolved issue, and motivation
  • Section 3.1 · RQ & Hypothesis: Provisional RQ, expected relationship or outcome, and the rationale for that expectation
  • Evidence that could support or challenge the expectation
  • Citations or links for at least three related academic papers or research-based design cases; no separate source-analysis report is required

Presentation

No formal presentation is required. Bring the working draft and source links to the Week 3 workshop.

Upload file

File type
Shared master manuscript update
Recommended length
2–4 working paragraphs plus the provisional RQ and hypothesis
File naming rule
No separate file
Example
Update Sections 1 and 3.1 in the team manuscript

Submission method

Update the designated sections of the shared master manuscript. Do not resubmit the in-class Snapshot as a separate homework file.

Learning Focus

  • Research framing: Converting a broad interest into a defensible research context and question.
  • Activity-to-paper translation: Turning decisions already made in class into manuscript-ready text.
Homework #3

Homework #3: Comparison Conditions + Initial Stimuli

Project
Project 1
Format
Team comparison-design and stimuli draft
Due
2026.10.02
Use the Week 4 FC lecture and team activity to define the comparison logic and create initial participant-facing stimuli for the Week 5 consultation.

Contents should include

  • Revised RQ and focal design mechanism
  • A realistic baseline and A/B or A/B/C comparison conditions
  • A side-by-side account of what changes and what remains controlled
  • Initial participant-facing sketches, flows, storyboards, or low-fidelity prototypes for every condition
  • Possible confounds or alternative explanations
  • Two or three specific questions or decisions for the consultation

Presentation

No formal presentation is required. Use the materials directly during the Week 5 team consultation.

Upload file

File type
Comparison Condition & Stimuli Canvas with linked or embedded stimuli
Recommended length
One concise canvas plus the minimum representations needed to compare every condition
File naming rule
One shared submission per team

Submission method

Submit or link the shared team canvas before the Week 5 consultation. Keep the working manuscript aligned with any revised RQ decisions.

Learning Focus

  • Comparative reasoning: Selecting a meaningful baseline and isolating the intended design factor.
  • Stimuli concretization: Making each condition visible enough to reveal ambiguity and confounds.
Homework #4

Homework #4: Revised Comparison Conditions + Stimuli

Project
Project 1
Format
Team working-manuscript and stimuli revision
Due
2026.10.09
Revise the comparison logic and participant-facing stimuli using the decisions made during the Week 5 consultation.

Contents should include

  • Updated baseline and A/B or A/B/C condition descriptions
  • Consultation decisions recorded as Keep / Revise / Test Next
  • Revised stimuli for every condition
  • What changes across conditions and what remains controlled
  • Possible confounds and how they will be reduced
  • Updated Section 3.2 comparison rationale and condition table or figure
  • The scope and next actions for Week 6 stimuli development

Presentation

No formal presentation is required. The revised materials become the starting point for the Week 6 asynchronous stimuli-development session.

Upload file

File type
Shared master manuscript update plus revised stimuli links
Recommended length
Updated Section 3.2, condition table or figure, and consultation decision log
File naming rule
No duplicate manuscript file; update the shared team materials

Submission method

Update the shared master manuscript and linked stimuli. Keep the Consultation Decision Log with the working materials.

Learning Focus

  • Feedback integration: Turning consultation into explicit design and research decisions.
  • Research readiness: Resolving major comparison problems before increasing prototype fidelity.
Homework #5

Homework #5: Section 3.3 Research Stimuli

Project
Project 1
Format
Team working-manuscript update with figures and prototype links
Due
2026.10.16
Use the submitted Research Stimuli Draft + Documentation Sheet to write the Section 3.3 working draft.

Contents should include

  • The participant-facing form of every condition
  • The intended design difference represented by each stimulus
  • Elements controlled across conditions
  • The rationale for the chosen stimulus format and fidelity
  • Relevant screenshots, flows, or figures with draft captions
  • Accessible prototype, media, or backup links

Presentation

No formal presentation is required. Bring the revised stimuli and unresolved questions to the Week 7 integration workshop.

Upload file

File type
Shared master manuscript update plus accessible links
Recommended length
One concise subsection with a condition-by-condition description and figures
File naming rule
No separate manuscript file
Example
Add Section 3.3, figures, captions, and working links

Submission method

Update Section 3.3 in the shared master manuscript. The prototype and Documentation Sheet together should make the writing possible without recreating the rationale from scratch.

Learning Focus

  • Stimulus documentation: Making the research instrument understandable and reproducible.
  • Control and validity: Showing that non-target differences are minimized across conditions.
Homework #6

Homework #6: Post-presentation Sections 1–3.3 Revision

Project
Project 1
Format
Team targeted manuscript revision
Due
2026.10.30
Use the submitted Feedback Decision Log to revise the research foundation, RQ, comparison conditions, and stimuli.

Contents should include

  • Major feedback received during the presentation
  • Accept, Adapt, or Decline decisions and a brief rationale for each major point
  • Specific revisions to Sections 1–3.3
  • Priority corrections affecting research logic, condition validity, or stimulus clarity
  • Any unresolved issue that must be addressed before the study protocol is finalized

Presentation

No additional presentation is required.

Upload file

File type
Shared master manuscript update
Recommended length
Targeted revisions rather than a new report
File naming rule
No separate file
Example
Revise Sections 1–3.3 using the Feedback Decision Log

Submission method

Update the shared master manuscript. The Feedback Decision Log remains the decision record and does not need to be rewritten as a separate memo.

Learning Focus

  • Critical response to feedback: Making reasoned decisions rather than following every comment mechanically.
  • Study readiness: Stabilizing the research logic before beginning the Method section.
Homework #7

Homework #7: Section 4 Method Draft I

Project
Project 1
Format
Team working-manuscript update
Due
2026.11.06
Use the submitted Study Plan Snapshot + Method Mapping to draft the first version of Section 4.

Contents should include

  • 4.1 Participants: Target participants, inclusion criteria, and rationale
  • 4.2 Study Design: Within- or between-subject design, conditions, order, and rationale
  • 4.3 Tasks & Procedure: Initial step-by-step participant journey
  • 4.4 Measures: Quantitative measures, behavioral data, or manipulation checks
  • The source, construct, purpose, and data form of each established measure

Presentation

No formal presentation is required. Bring the draft and Study Plan Snapshot to Week 10.

Upload file

File type
Shared master manuscript update
Recommended length
A structured working Method draft based on the four mapping fields
File naming rule
No separate file
Example
Draft Sections 4.1–4.4 in the team manuscript

Submission method

Update Section 4 in the shared master manuscript. Do not recreate the study-flow diagram as a separate homework submission.

Learning Focus

  • Method alignment: Connecting participant, task, condition, and measure decisions to the RQ.
  • Reproducibility: Describing the study clearly enough for another researcher to understand the plan.
Homework #8

Homework #8: Finalize the Study Materials Pack & Conduct a Pilot

Project
Project 1
Format
Team operational research homework
Due
2026.11.13
Finalize the Study Materials Pack and conduct at least one pilot session. No full Method prose is due this week.

Contents should include

  • Participant introduction and consent procedure
  • Tasks, condition order, and moderator script
  • Questionnaire, qualitative prompts, and data-recording materials
  • Debriefing and anonymization procedures
  • Completed Protocol-to-Method Mapping with decisions, rationales, and destination subsections
  • Pilot notes covering clarity, timing, technical issues, task flow, and measurement problems

Presentation

No formal presentation is required. Bring the pilot evidence and working protocol to Week 11.

Upload file

File type
Study Materials Pack, Protocol-to-Method Mapping, and pilot notes
Recommended length
Complete enough for another team member to run the pilot consistently
File naming rule
H8_TeamName_StudyMaterialsPack.pdf or a clearly organized shared folder
Example
H8_TeamA_StudyMaterialsPack.pdf

Submission method

Submit or link the finalized Study Materials Pack and mapping in the designated course folder. Keep all participant-facing materials and pilot notes together.

Learning Focus

  • Protocol readiness: Turning a study plan into materials that can be used with real participants.
  • Pilot-based improvement: Identifying problems before the final Method section and main study.
Homework #9

Homework #9: Final Method Section

Project
Project 1
Format
Team final Method-section update
Due
2026.11.20
Use the final Protocol-to-Method Mapping to complete Sections 4.1–4.6 after the pilot-driven revisions are finalized.

Contents should include

  • 4.1 Participants: Final criteria, sample plan, and rationale
  • 4.2 Study Design: Final conditions, participant structure, and order
  • 4.3 Tasks & Procedure: Final participant journey and moderator process
  • 4.4 Measures: Final quantitative and qualitative measures
  • 4.5 Pilot Testing & Revisions: Meaningful issues discovered and resulting changes
  • 4.6 Data Analysis: Planned qualitative and quantitative analysis
  • Final methodological decisions rather than copied participant-facing scripts or a pilot diary

Presentation

No formal presentation is required.

Upload file

File type
Shared master manuscript update
Recommended length
Complete Sections 4.1–4.6
File naming rule
No separate manuscript file
Example
Complete Section 4 in the team manuscript

Submission method

Update Sections 4.1–4.6 in the shared master manuscript.

Learning Focus

  • Methodological transparency: Explaining the final decisions and meaningful pilot-driven changes.
  • Non-duplicative workflow: Writing the Method once from the final mapping rather than rewriting an unstable protocol.

Study execution requirement

Conduct the main study and organize all qualitative and quantitative data in anonymized form before Week 12.
Homework #10

Homework #10: Sections 5.1 & 5.2 Quantitative Results Working Draft

Project
Project 1
Format
Team quantitative-results manuscript update
Due
2026.11.27
Use the submitted Results Snapshot to draft the Data Overview and Quantitative Results subsections.

Contents should include

  • 5.1 Data Overview: Final participant count, exclusions, and dataset structure
  • 5.2 Quantitative Results: Descriptive statistics, appropriate comparisons, and correctly labeled inferential results
  • Clear figures, tables, labels, and captions
  • Accurate reporting of null, mixed, or unexpected results
  • Clear separation between observed results and interpretation

Presentation

No formal presentation is required. Bring the draft and cleaned qualitative dataset to Week 13.

Upload file

File type
Shared master manuscript update
Recommended length
Data overview plus the quantitative-results working draft
File naming rule
No separate file
Example
Draft Sections 5.1 and 5.2 in the team manuscript

Submission method

Update Sections 5.1 and 5.2 in the shared master manuscript. Statistical output files may be linked as supporting materials when needed.

Learning Focus

  • Accurate reporting: Matching the analysis to the study design and reporting results transparently.
  • Evidence clarity: Presenting descriptive and inferential results with readable figures, tables, and labels.
Homework #11

Homework #11: Complete Section 5 Results Draft

Project
Project 1
Format
Team complete Results-section update
Due
2026.12.03
Combine the existing quantitative-results draft with the submitted Qualitative Pattern Board to complete Section 5.

Contents should include

  • 5.1 Data Overview: Final participant count, exclusions, and dataset structure
  • 5.2 Quantitative Results: Descriptive statistics, appropriate comparisons, and correctly labeled inferential results
  • 5.3 Qualitative Results: Final categories or themes with supporting and contradictory evidence
  • Clear figures, tables, labels, and captions
  • Accurate reporting of null, mixed, contradictory, or unexpected results
  • Clear separation between observed results and interpretation

Presentation

No formal presentation is required. Bring the completed Results draft and interpretation questions to Week 14.

Upload file

File type
Shared master manuscript update
Recommended length
Complete Section 5 with figures and tables
File naming rule
No separate file
Example
Complete Sections 5.1–5.3 in the team manuscript

Submission method

Update Section 5 in the shared master manuscript. Statistical output files and the Qualitative Pattern Board may be linked as supporting materials when needed.

Learning Focus

  • Integrated evidence: Presenting qualitative and quantitative findings as complementary evidence.
  • Transparent reporting: Preserving the path from data and analysis to findings while stating boundaries and limitations.